Adomnán, Plague, and the Easter Controversy

Typeset version

 

TY  - JOUR
  - Woods, D.
  - 2011
  - December
  - Anglo-Saxon England
  - Adomnán, Plague, and the Easter Controversy
  - Published
  - ()
  - Adomnan Iona Northumbria Easter plague Columba Bede
  - 40
  - 1
  - 13
  - Adomnán’s description (Vita Columbae II.46) of how the intercession of St. Columba preserved the Picts and the Irish in Britain alone among the peoples of western Europe against two great epidemics of bubonic plague is a coded defence of their use of the traditional Irish 84-year Easter table against the Dionysian Easter table as used throughout the rest of western Europe. His implication is that God sent the plagues to punish those who used the Dionysian table. Hence Adomnán still adhered to the 84-year table by the time that he composed the Vita Columbae c. 697. It probably took a third epidemic 700–c. 702 to persuade Adomnán that his interpretation of the earlier epidemics was incorrect, so that Bede (HE V.15) is correct to date his conversion to the Dionysian table to a third visit to Northumbria c. 702.
  - Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
  - 0263-6751
  - 10.1017/S0263675111000032
DA  - 2011/12
ER  - 
@article{V142031761,
   = {Woods,  D. },
   = {2011},
   = {December},
   = {Anglo-Saxon England},
   = {Adomnán, Plague, and the Easter Controversy},
   = {Published},
   = {()},
   = {Adomnan Iona Northumbria Easter plague Columba Bede},
   = {40},
  pages = {1--13},
   = {{Adomnán’s description (Vita Columbae II.46) of how the intercession of St. Columba preserved the Picts and the Irish in Britain alone among the peoples of western Europe against two great epidemics of bubonic plague is a coded defence of their use of the traditional Irish 84-year Easter table against the Dionysian Easter table as used throughout the rest of western Europe. His implication is that God sent the plagues to punish those who used the Dionysian table. Hence Adomnán still adhered to the 84-year table by the time that he composed the Vita Columbae c. 697. It probably took a third epidemic 700–c. 702 to persuade Adomnán that his interpretation of the earlier epidemics was incorrect, so that Bede (HE V.15) is correct to date his conversion to the Dionysian table to a third visit to Northumbria c. 702.}},
   = {Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK},
  issn = {0263-6751},
   = {10.1017/S0263675111000032},
  source = {IRIS}
}
AUTHORSWoods, D.
YEAR2011
MONTHDecember
JOURNAL_CODEAnglo-Saxon England
TITLEAdomnán, Plague, and the Easter Controversy
STATUSPublished
TIMES_CITED()
SEARCH_KEYWORDAdomnan Iona Northumbria Easter plague Columba Bede
VOLUME40
ISSUE
START_PAGE1
END_PAGE13
ABSTRACTAdomnán’s description (Vita Columbae II.46) of how the intercession of St. Columba preserved the Picts and the Irish in Britain alone among the peoples of western Europe against two great epidemics of bubonic plague is a coded defence of their use of the traditional Irish 84-year Easter table against the Dionysian Easter table as used throughout the rest of western Europe. His implication is that God sent the plagues to punish those who used the Dionysian table. Hence Adomnán still adhered to the 84-year table by the time that he composed the Vita Columbae c. 697. It probably took a third epidemic 700–c. 702 to persuade Adomnán that his interpretation of the earlier epidemics was incorrect, so that Bede (HE V.15) is correct to date his conversion to the Dionysian table to a third visit to Northumbria c. 702.
PUBLISHER_LOCATIONCambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
ISBN_ISSN0263-6751
EDITION
URL
DOI_LINK10.1017/S0263675111000032
FUNDING_BODY
GRANT_DETAILS