Legal Intimidation,

Typeset version

 

TY  - BOOK
  - Donson, F. 
  - 2000
  - January
  - Legal Intimidation,
  - Free Association Books
  - London
  - Published
  - SLAPPS (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation), well known in the United States of America, are on the increase in the United Kingdom. SLAPPS are court actions taken by powerful or wealthy individuals or organizations against ordinary people who seek to express their views and to take part in the decision-making processes which affect their lives. Their effect is meant to "chill" through legal intimidation - to stop the critics and end the debates. A steady growth of SLAPPs has occurred where government and business sees their interests being threatened by those who dare to rock the boat. The court case becomes a weapon in a larger political war, tying people up in court rooms, sapping their energy and money, carrying the fear of severe legal sanction. In this way the law is used not to protect a valid legal claim but rather to frighten and silence those who are bold enough  to criticise, question and speak out. Looking at various high-profile cases the author considers both the theory and practice of attacks upon free speech in a modern democracy. In the new era  of human rights in the United Kingdom the author poses important  questions about what the use of such legal actions tells us about the health of our democracy at the turn of the millennium.
  - 1 85343 504 X
  - 240
DA  - 2000/01
ER  - 
@book{V31041706,
   = {Donson,  F.  },
   = {2000},
   = {January},
   = {Legal Intimidation,},
   = {{Free Association Books}},
   = {London},
   = {Published},
   = {{SLAPPS (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation), well known in the United States of America, are on the increase in the United Kingdom. SLAPPS are court actions taken by powerful or wealthy individuals or organizations against ordinary people who seek to express their views and to take part in the decision-making processes which affect their lives. Their effect is meant to "chill" through legal intimidation - to stop the critics and end the debates. A steady growth of SLAPPs has occurred where government and business sees their interests being threatened by those who dare to rock the boat. The court case becomes a weapon in a larger political war, tying people up in court rooms, sapping their energy and money, carrying the fear of severe legal sanction. In this way the law is used not to protect a valid legal claim but rather to frighten and silence those who are bold enough  to criticise, question and speak out. Looking at various high-profile cases the author considers both the theory and practice of attacks upon free speech in a modern democracy. In the new era  of human rights in the United Kingdom the author poses important  questions about what the use of such legal actions tells us about the health of our democracy at the turn of the millennium.}},
   = {1 85343 504 X},
   = {240},
  source = {IRIS}
}
AUTHORSDonson, F.
YEAR2000
MONTHJanuary
TITLELegal Intimidation,
PUBLISHERFree Association Books
PUBLISHER_LOCATIONLondon
STATUSPublished
PEER_REVIEW
SEARCH_KEYWORD
ABSTRACTSLAPPS (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation), well known in the United States of America, are on the increase in the United Kingdom. SLAPPS are court actions taken by powerful or wealthy individuals or organizations against ordinary people who seek to express their views and to take part in the decision-making processes which affect their lives. Their effect is meant to "chill" through legal intimidation - to stop the critics and end the debates. A steady growth of SLAPPs has occurred where government and business sees their interests being threatened by those who dare to rock the boat. The court case becomes a weapon in a larger political war, tying people up in court rooms, sapping their energy and money, carrying the fear of severe legal sanction. In this way the law is used not to protect a valid legal claim but rather to frighten and silence those who are bold enough  to criticise, question and speak out. Looking at various high-profile cases the author considers both the theory and practice of attacks upon free speech in a modern democracy. In the new era  of human rights in the United Kingdom the author poses important  questions about what the use of such legal actions tells us about the health of our democracy at the turn of the millennium.
EDITION
ISBN_ISSN1 85343 504 X
EDITORS
URL
PAGE_COUNT240
DOI_LINK
FUNDING_BODY
GRANT_DETAILS