Ascertaining women's choice of title during pregnancy and childbirth.

Typeset version

 

TY  - JOUR
  - Denning AS, Tuttle LK, Bryant VJ, Walker SP, Higgins JR
  - 2002
  - May
  - Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  - Ascertaining women's choice of title during pregnancy and childbirth.
  - Validated
  - ()
  - 42
  - 2
  - 125
  - 129
  - METHODS: A questionnaire was administered to 958 women attending the antenatal clinic at Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, to ascertain their choice of title during pregnancy Midwifery, nursing and medical staff (376 in total) were also invited to respond to a similar questionnaire. RESULTS: The response rate was 73.6% from the survey of all women who were overwhelmingly in favour of being called 'patient' as their first choice (34%), followed by 'other' (20%) and then 'mother' (19%). Virtually all women requesting 'other' wished to be called by their name. Women wishing to be called 'patient' for first choice did not significantly differ from the remainder of the study group in age, gestation, number of previous pregnancies, or number of children. When women from the Family Birth Centre (FBC) were analysed as a separate group, they had a clear preference to be called 'other' (unanimously, by their name) than the general antenatal population (odds ratio (OR) 5.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.1, 8.3; p < 0.0001). The staff survey, with a response rate of 84%, also demonstrated that 'patient' was the most popular first choice for patient title. Medical staff were significantly more likely to choose 'patient' (OR 4.2, 95% CI 2.3, 7.7; p < 0.0001), though the term 'patient' was the preferred choice of all staff.
DA  - 2002/05
ER  - 
@article{V69093587,
   = {Denning AS,  Tuttle LK and  Bryant VJ,  Walker SP and  Higgins JR },
   = {2002},
   = {May},
   = {Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology},
   = {Ascertaining women's choice of title during pregnancy and childbirth.},
   = {Validated},
   = {()},
   = {42},
   = {2},
  pages = {125--129},
   = {{METHODS: A questionnaire was administered to 958 women attending the antenatal clinic at Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, to ascertain their choice of title during pregnancy Midwifery, nursing and medical staff (376 in total) were also invited to respond to a similar questionnaire. RESULTS: The response rate was 73.6% from the survey of all women who were overwhelmingly in favour of being called 'patient' as their first choice (34%), followed by 'other' (20%) and then 'mother' (19%). Virtually all women requesting 'other' wished to be called by their name. Women wishing to be called 'patient' for first choice did not significantly differ from the remainder of the study group in age, gestation, number of previous pregnancies, or number of children. When women from the Family Birth Centre (FBC) were analysed as a separate group, they had a clear preference to be called 'other' (unanimously, by their name) than the general antenatal population (odds ratio (OR) 5.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.1, 8.3; p < 0.0001). The staff survey, with a response rate of 84%, also demonstrated that 'patient' was the most popular first choice for patient title. Medical staff were significantly more likely to choose 'patient' (OR 4.2, 95% CI 2.3, 7.7; p < 0.0001), though the term 'patient' was the preferred choice of all staff.}},
  source = {IRIS}
}
AUTHORSDenning AS, Tuttle LK, Bryant VJ, Walker SP, Higgins JR
YEAR2002
MONTHMay
JOURNAL_CODEJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
TITLEAscertaining women's choice of title during pregnancy and childbirth.
STATUSValidated
TIMES_CITED()
SEARCH_KEYWORD
VOLUME42
ISSUE2
START_PAGE125
END_PAGE129
ABSTRACTMETHODS: A questionnaire was administered to 958 women attending the antenatal clinic at Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, to ascertain their choice of title during pregnancy Midwifery, nursing and medical staff (376 in total) were also invited to respond to a similar questionnaire. RESULTS: The response rate was 73.6% from the survey of all women who were overwhelmingly in favour of being called 'patient' as their first choice (34%), followed by 'other' (20%) and then 'mother' (19%). Virtually all women requesting 'other' wished to be called by their name. Women wishing to be called 'patient' for first choice did not significantly differ from the remainder of the study group in age, gestation, number of previous pregnancies, or number of children. When women from the Family Birth Centre (FBC) were analysed as a separate group, they had a clear preference to be called 'other' (unanimously, by their name) than the general antenatal population (odds ratio (OR) 5.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.1, 8.3; p < 0.0001). The staff survey, with a response rate of 84%, also demonstrated that 'patient' was the most popular first choice for patient title. Medical staff were significantly more likely to choose 'patient' (OR 4.2, 95% CI 2.3, 7.7; p < 0.0001), though the term 'patient' was the preferred choice of all staff.
PUBLISHER_LOCATION
ISBN_ISSN
EDITION
URL
DOI_LINK
FUNDING_BODY
GRANT_DETAILS