A Modified Protocol for Bisulfite Genomic Sequencing of Difficult Samples.

Typeset version

 

TY  - JOUR
  - Pappas J.J., Toulouse A., Bradley W.E.C.
  - 2009
  - June
  - Biological Procedures Online
  - A Modified Protocol for Bisulfite Genomic Sequencing of Difficult Samples.
  - Published
  - Altmetric: 2 ()
  - 11
  - 99
  - 112
  - The bisulfite genomic sequencing protocol is a widely used method for analyzing DNA methylation. It relies on the deamination of unmethylated cytosine residues to uracil; however, its high rates of DNA degradation and incomplete cytosine to uracil conversion often lead to failed experiments, uninformative results, and false positives. Here, we report the addition of a single-step multiple restriction enzyme digestion (MRED) designed to differentially digest polymerase chain reaction products amplified from unconverted DNA while leaving those of converted DNA intact. We show that for our model system, RARB2 P2 promoter, use of MRED increased informative sequencings ninefold, and MRED did not alter the clonal representation in one fully methylated cell line, H-596, treated or not with 5-azadeoxycytidine, a methylation inhibitor. We believe that this method may easily be adapted for analyzing other genes and provide guidelines for selecting the most appropriate MRED restriction enzymes.
  - http://www.biologicalproceduresonline.com/content/11/1/99
  - 10.1007/s12575-009-9010-3
DA  - 2009/06
ER  - 
@article{V26233728,
   = {Pappas J.J.,  Toulouse A. and  Bradley W.E.C. },
   = {2009},
   = {June},
   = {Biological Procedures Online},
   = {A Modified Protocol for Bisulfite Genomic Sequencing of Difficult Samples.},
   = {Published},
   = {Altmetric: 2 ()},
   = {11},
  pages = {99--112},
   = {{The bisulfite genomic sequencing protocol is a widely used method for analyzing DNA methylation. It relies on the deamination of unmethylated cytosine residues to uracil; however, its high rates of DNA degradation and incomplete cytosine to uracil conversion often lead to failed experiments, uninformative results, and false positives. Here, we report the addition of a single-step multiple restriction enzyme digestion (MRED) designed to differentially digest polymerase chain reaction products amplified from unconverted DNA while leaving those of converted DNA intact. We show that for our model system, RARB2 P2 promoter, use of MRED increased informative sequencings ninefold, and MRED did not alter the clonal representation in one fully methylated cell line, H-596, treated or not with 5-azadeoxycytidine, a methylation inhibitor. We believe that this method may easily be adapted for analyzing other genes and provide guidelines for selecting the most appropriate MRED restriction enzymes.}},
   = {http://www.biologicalproceduresonline.com/content/11/1/99},
   = {10.1007/s12575-009-9010-3},
  source = {IRIS}
}
AUTHORSPappas J.J., Toulouse A., Bradley W.E.C.
YEAR2009
MONTHJune
JOURNAL_CODEBiological Procedures Online
TITLEA Modified Protocol for Bisulfite Genomic Sequencing of Difficult Samples.
STATUSPublished
TIMES_CITEDAltmetric: 2 ()
SEARCH_KEYWORD
VOLUME11
ISSUE
START_PAGE99
END_PAGE112
ABSTRACTThe bisulfite genomic sequencing protocol is a widely used method for analyzing DNA methylation. It relies on the deamination of unmethylated cytosine residues to uracil; however, its high rates of DNA degradation and incomplete cytosine to uracil conversion often lead to failed experiments, uninformative results, and false positives. Here, we report the addition of a single-step multiple restriction enzyme digestion (MRED) designed to differentially digest polymerase chain reaction products amplified from unconverted DNA while leaving those of converted DNA intact. We show that for our model system, RARB2 P2 promoter, use of MRED increased informative sequencings ninefold, and MRED did not alter the clonal representation in one fully methylated cell line, H-596, treated or not with 5-azadeoxycytidine, a methylation inhibitor. We believe that this method may easily be adapted for analyzing other genes and provide guidelines for selecting the most appropriate MRED restriction enzymes.
PUBLISHER_LOCATION
ISBN_ISSN
EDITION
URLhttp://www.biologicalproceduresonline.com/content/11/1/99
DOI_LINK10.1007/s12575-009-9010-3
FUNDING_BODY
GRANT_DETAILS