Genomic diversity and relatedness of bifidobacteria isolated from a porcine cecum

Typeset version

 

TY  - JOUR
  - Simpson, PJ,Stanton, C,Fitzgerald, GF,Ross, RP
  - 2003
  - March
  - Journal of Bacteriology
  - Genomic diversity and relatedness of bifidobacteria isolated from a porcine cecum
  - Validated
  - ()
  - FIELD GEL-ELECTROPHORESIS GENUS BIFIDOBACTERIUM SP-NOV MOLECULAR ANALYSIS EPITHELIAL-CELLS COMB-NOV STRAINS ADHESION PSEUDOLONGUM ENUMERATION
  - 185
  - 2571
  - 2581
  - This study initially involved the isolation of a number of bifidobacteria from either the lumen or the epithelium of a porcine cecum. A total of 160 isolates were selected at random on MRS plates containing cysteine hydrochloride (0.5 g/liter) and mupirocin (50 mg/liter). All were identified as bifidobacteria based on fructose-6-phosphate phosphoketolase activity. Following genomic digestion with the restriction enzyme XbaI and pulsed-field gel ellectrophoresis (PFGE), the isolates produced 15 distinct macro-restriction patterns. Several of the PFGE patterns differed by only 1, 2, or 3 DNA fragments and were grouped as related patterns into seven, PFGE types, termed A through G. The related patterns appeared to show genomic plasticity within the isolates arising from chromosomal mutations or possibly horizontal transfer of plasmids. The relative frequency of each PFGE type was maintained within each cecal sample, with PFGE type E representing approximately 50% of the isolates. Randomly amplified pollymorphic DNA PCR, cell morphology, whole-cell protein profiling, 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing, and DNA-DNA hybridization were used to determine if the seven apparently unrelated PFGE types represented genetically distinct isolates. Four groups were identified: PFGE types A, C/D/G, B/E, and F, and these appeared to represent Bifidobacterium minimum, Bifidobacterium pseudolongum subsp. pseudolongum, and Bifidobacterium pseudolongum subsp. globosum and two new species, respectively. The data demonstrate the presence of considerable genomic diversity within a relatively simple bifidobacteria population, consisting of 15 distinct strains representing four groups, which was maintained throughout the porcine cecal contents and epithelial layer.
  - DOI 10.1128/JB.185.8.2571-2581.2003
DA  - 2003/03
ER  - 
@article{V43337937,
   = {Simpson,  PJ and Stanton,  C and Fitzgerald,  GF and Ross,  RP },
   = {2003},
   = {March},
   = {Journal of Bacteriology},
   = {Genomic diversity and relatedness of bifidobacteria isolated from a porcine cecum},
   = {Validated},
   = {()},
   = {FIELD GEL-ELECTROPHORESIS GENUS BIFIDOBACTERIUM SP-NOV MOLECULAR ANALYSIS EPITHELIAL-CELLS COMB-NOV STRAINS ADHESION PSEUDOLONGUM ENUMERATION},
   = {185},
  pages = {2571--2581},
   = {{This study initially involved the isolation of a number of bifidobacteria from either the lumen or the epithelium of a porcine cecum. A total of 160 isolates were selected at random on MRS plates containing cysteine hydrochloride (0.5 g/liter) and mupirocin (50 mg/liter). All were identified as bifidobacteria based on fructose-6-phosphate phosphoketolase activity. Following genomic digestion with the restriction enzyme XbaI and pulsed-field gel ellectrophoresis (PFGE), the isolates produced 15 distinct macro-restriction patterns. Several of the PFGE patterns differed by only 1, 2, or 3 DNA fragments and were grouped as related patterns into seven, PFGE types, termed A through G. The related patterns appeared to show genomic plasticity within the isolates arising from chromosomal mutations or possibly horizontal transfer of plasmids. The relative frequency of each PFGE type was maintained within each cecal sample, with PFGE type E representing approximately 50% of the isolates. Randomly amplified pollymorphic DNA PCR, cell morphology, whole-cell protein profiling, 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing, and DNA-DNA hybridization were used to determine if the seven apparently unrelated PFGE types represented genetically distinct isolates. Four groups were identified: PFGE types A, C/D/G, B/E, and F, and these appeared to represent Bifidobacterium minimum, Bifidobacterium pseudolongum subsp. pseudolongum, and Bifidobacterium pseudolongum subsp. globosum and two new species, respectively. The data demonstrate the presence of considerable genomic diversity within a relatively simple bifidobacteria population, consisting of 15 distinct strains representing four groups, which was maintained throughout the porcine cecal contents and epithelial layer.}},
   = {DOI 10.1128/JB.185.8.2571-2581.2003},
  source = {IRIS}
}
AUTHORSSimpson, PJ,Stanton, C,Fitzgerald, GF,Ross, RP
YEAR2003
MONTHMarch
JOURNAL_CODEJournal of Bacteriology
TITLEGenomic diversity and relatedness of bifidobacteria isolated from a porcine cecum
STATUSValidated
TIMES_CITED()
SEARCH_KEYWORDFIELD GEL-ELECTROPHORESIS GENUS BIFIDOBACTERIUM SP-NOV MOLECULAR ANALYSIS EPITHELIAL-CELLS COMB-NOV STRAINS ADHESION PSEUDOLONGUM ENUMERATION
VOLUME185
ISSUE
START_PAGE2571
END_PAGE2581
ABSTRACTThis study initially involved the isolation of a number of bifidobacteria from either the lumen or the epithelium of a porcine cecum. A total of 160 isolates were selected at random on MRS plates containing cysteine hydrochloride (0.5 g/liter) and mupirocin (50 mg/liter). All were identified as bifidobacteria based on fructose-6-phosphate phosphoketolase activity. Following genomic digestion with the restriction enzyme XbaI and pulsed-field gel ellectrophoresis (PFGE), the isolates produced 15 distinct macro-restriction patterns. Several of the PFGE patterns differed by only 1, 2, or 3 DNA fragments and were grouped as related patterns into seven, PFGE types, termed A through G. The related patterns appeared to show genomic plasticity within the isolates arising from chromosomal mutations or possibly horizontal transfer of plasmids. The relative frequency of each PFGE type was maintained within each cecal sample, with PFGE type E representing approximately 50% of the isolates. Randomly amplified pollymorphic DNA PCR, cell morphology, whole-cell protein profiling, 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing, and DNA-DNA hybridization were used to determine if the seven apparently unrelated PFGE types represented genetically distinct isolates. Four groups were identified: PFGE types A, C/D/G, B/E, and F, and these appeared to represent Bifidobacterium minimum, Bifidobacterium pseudolongum subsp. pseudolongum, and Bifidobacterium pseudolongum subsp. globosum and two new species, respectively. The data demonstrate the presence of considerable genomic diversity within a relatively simple bifidobacteria population, consisting of 15 distinct strains representing four groups, which was maintained throughout the porcine cecal contents and epithelial layer.
PUBLISHER_LOCATION
ISBN_ISSN
EDITION
URL
DOI_LINKDOI 10.1128/JB.185.8.2571-2581.2003
FUNDING_BODY
GRANT_DETAILS